Medical Review Process

Every piece of clinical content on anxiety.md undergoes rigorous review to ensure accuracy, currency, and alignment with current evidence-based practice.

Clinically Reviewed

All clinical content on anxiety.md is reviewed by licensed mental health professionals before publication and updated regularly.

Our Clinical Advisory Network

anxiety.md, part of the thrive.md health network, works with a network of clinical advisors — licensed psychiatrists, psychologists, and mental health professionals with expertise in anxiety disorders. Our advisors:

We do not name individual reviewers to protect their privacy and prevent our content from being misattributed as their personal medical advice. Content is reviewed as "anxiety.md Clinical Advisory Team" to represent our collective review process rather than any individual clinician's opinion.

What Reviewers Check

Our clinical review process evaluates every piece of content across multiple dimensions:

Clinical Review Checklist

Medical accuracy: Are all clinical facts correct and supported by evidence?
Current guidelines: Does the content reflect current diagnostic criteria (DSM-5-TR) and treatment guidelines?
Appropriate nuance: Are complexities and limitations of research appropriately conveyed?
Safety considerations: Are appropriate warnings, crisis resources, and "seek professional help" guidance included?
No harmful misinformation: Could any content be misinterpreted in ways that could harm readers?
Balanced treatment information: Are benefits, risks, and limitations of treatments fairly presented?
Clinical context: Is the information appropriately contextualized for a lay audience?
Source quality: Are citations from reputable, peer-reviewed sources?

Accepted Sources

Our content is built on evidence from authoritative sources. We prioritize:

Clinical Guidelines

APA Practice Guidelines, NICE Guidelines, WHO recommendations

Government Agencies

NIMH, CDC, WHO, SAMHSA

Diagnostic Standards

DSM-5-TR, ICD-11

Systematic Reviews

Cochrane Reviews, meta-analyses

Peer-Reviewed Journals

JAMA Psychiatry, The Lancet Psychiatry, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Behaviour Research and Therapy

Professional Organizations

American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, ADAA

Review Frequency

Our content review schedule ensures information remains current:

Limitations

We want to be transparent about what our review process does not guarantee:

Report an Inaccuracy

We take accuracy seriously and welcome reader input. If you believe any content on anxiety.md contains medical inaccuracies, outdated information, or could be improved:

Contact us: Email corrections@thrive.md with:
• The specific content/page in question
• The issue you identified
• Supporting sources (if available)

All submissions are reviewed by our editorial team and, when warranted, escalated to clinical review. We respond within 5 business days and make corrections promptly when errors are confirmed.

For Healthcare Providers

If you're a healthcare provider interested in contributing to or reviewing our content, we welcome your expertise. We're always looking to expand our clinical advisory network.

Contact: clinical@thrive.md

Questions?

For questions about our medical review process or editorial policies, please see our Editorial Policy or contact us at hello@thrive.md.